Movie Review: Danger Close - The Battle of Long Tan

 

Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan

After a long time, Saturday night was reserved for movie. "The Battle of Long Tan" was an Australian war film that was on the table. I admit that I have stopped watching war films since the most of them appear to be propaganda with little content and historical authenticity. This is when the film really shines out.

The shocking aspect is the Australian government's appreciation of troops' gallantry after 42 years long years. Yup, you read it right, red tape exists everywhere. Anyways lets get back to movie.

So, how does this sound? This film makes a real attempt to depict the battle scene without gimmicks or false bravado. The Australian soldiers were outnumbered, inexperienced, and with an average age of 20 years facing their worst nightmare - The Vietnamese Army.

This historical war picture will have you on the edge of your seat as we discuss its film summary, historical accuracy, similarities to other war films, and, of course, the all-important overall rating and recommendation. So grab some popcorn and let's get started! 

Film Synopsis and Background

Set during the Vietnam War, "Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan" is a gripping tour through one of the most ferocious fights in Australian military history.

Starting at base camp Nui Dat, Major Smith (Fimmel), an ex-Special Forces soldier, is fed up with babysitting green conscripts, the most of whom are under the age of 21.

Soon, the story took a critical turn when Smith quickly divided the force into roaming platoons. As one advanced party was nearly overrun by the enemy, Smith, who was heading the second party along with the third section of the 11th platoon, was forced to dash to save the surviving advanced party men. Racing against time and well-entrenched Viet Cong fighters, the true spirit of combat emerges. As bullets fly and explosions rock the screen, we see the troops' genuine grit and tenacity as they battle for their lives and one another.

The film captures the harsh realities of war with stunning visual effects and attention to historical accuracy. The audience is transported back in time to the humid jungles of Vietnam. The cinematography beautifully depicts the tension and chaos of the battlefield, immersing viewers in the heart-pounding experience of combat. 

The film pays tribute to the sacrifices and heroism of the soldiers who fought in the Battle of Long Tan, shedding light on a lesser-known chapter of Australian military history.

Historical Accuracy and Context

The film is meticulously researched and expertly crafted to transport viewers back to the intense and harrowing Vietnam War era. From the authentic costumes to the realistic battle sequences, every detail feels genuine and true to history. You'll feel like you're right there in the muddy trenches!

The honesty with which the film was made allow viewers to to truly immerse themselves in the story and connect with the characters on a more personal level.

Comparisons to Other War Films

Now, let's talk about how "Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan" stacks up against other war films. 

When delving deeper into the realm of war films, it's fascinating to draw parallels between "Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan" and iconic movies like "Saving Private Ryan" and "Black Hawk Down." While each film has its own unique narrative and style, they all share a common thread of showcasing the harrowing realities of war and the resilience of the human spirit.

I am happy to include this film on the legendary list of films because of its basic storytelling style and realistic representation of military tactics. This keeps the viewers engaged until the final frame.

My Take

The emotional depth of the characters and the exploration of themes such as solidarity, leadership, and resilience elevate "Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan" beyond a mere action flick. It serves as a poignant reminder of the courage and camaraderie that can emerge in the face of adversity, leaving a lasting impact on viewers long after the credits roll.

So, what's the final verdict on "Danger Close: The Battle of Long Tan"? Drumroll, please! With its powerful storytelling, jaw-dropping action sequences, and balanced mix of drama and humor, this film earns a solid 9 out of 10. It's a must-watch for any war film enthusiast or anyone looking for a thrilling cinematic experience.

You may write back at garv560@gmail.com

Why I Killed The Mahatma By Koenraad Elst

 

My disclaimer would be that this isn't the first book I have read regarding the Indian Independence struggle and the role of Gandhi Ji. I sincerely admire his contribution (or lack thereof for others) to the cause, which he turned into a mass movement and sustained for a long time. However, this book portrays a different image of the actions of the holier-than-thou figure, who is above criticism. The book underlines Gandhi Ji's many blunders. The book bares all. The publication collects Nathuram Godse's "original testimony" from his assassination trial.

The book gave insight into Godse’s thought process and what motivated him to execute that act. Godse admits that he respected Gandhi Ji but could not allow him to pursue his escapades at the expense of the nation. Godse minutely analyses Gandhi Ji's activities and their impact on Indian society.  

This book explores Gandhi ji's whims and follies and odd experiments, for which Hindu society and country paid dearly. It dramatically transformed my perspective on many heroes of the Indian Freedom Movement. This is a FANTASTIC read, and I'll explain why.

Fake Narrative  

One of the prominent narratives busted by this book is the impression most Indians have regarding the participation of the Muslim community in the freedom struggle. As is evident from the proofs provided, there is nothing white or honest in the statement. Most of them were yearning to subdue Hindus and rule India. As a lost gambler, Gandhi ji continued to up his stake despite repeated failures by conceding to their demands. He, however, never got any concession from the other side. You may read and understand the various debacles and the myth of Hindu-Muslim unity.

Ali Brothers 

In his pursuit of becoming the leader of the entire nation (read Hindus and Muslims), Gandhi Ji didn't blink once to part with the Ali brothers, who were rowdies and mischievous characters. These two characters played a significant role in the partition of India; however, the most shocking revelation was that these jokers invited the Amir of Afghanistan to invade India in 1920-21 with the direct and indirect support of Gandhi Ji.

All the gimmickry for the sake of becoming numero uno in India’s freedom struggle. Strange? Wait, there is a lot more in the book.

Non-Violence

Gandhi ji's flawed philosophy of non-violence, which he taught to his disciples, was disastrous from the outset. The Hindu community sacrificed terribly in the face of an aggressive and ruthless Muslim attack. It all began with the collapse of the Khilafat agitation, followed by Moplah riots, direct action day, and, eventually, partition, in which around 11 million people died, and the majority of them were Hindus. There are numerous violent incidents recorded during the period where Hindus were the victims, yet Gandhi Ji was not held accountable for his erroneous and unrealistic belief.

Treachery

Godse believed that Gandhi ji was solely responsible for all of the killings against Hindus. According to him, he pursued his Pacificist thinking and pushed Hindus not to retaliate, therefore encouraging others to continue their violent behaviour. Furthermore, Gandhi Ji readily surrendered to Muslim demands from the start till the Communal Award of 1932, thereby accepting the fraudulent partition of India that justified punishment.

As detailed in the book, not just regular Hindus but Gandhi's acquaintances and a few colleagues were subjected to his outbursts and whims.

 Arm Twisting

Godse pointed out multiple cases in which Gandhi Ji coerced the Congress and HMS into meeting his demands. Despite their doubts, people gave in to his demands, with terrible results.

Secular

The book questions the secular credentials of Gandhi Ji. If we look closely, it seems today’s politicians are influenced by the Gandhi philosphy on secularism.

Godse mentioned how the Hindu corpses continued to pile up, but Mahatma urged Hindus to die with a smile on their faces. His antics also included things like "Mothers and sisters should let Muslims in Pakistan rape them", with weird explanations to justify such acts. The strange part is he never questioned or cautioned Muslims for their heinous crimes. His siding with Suhrawardy (Calcutta massacre kingpin) or embracing Abdul Qayum (killer of Swami Shraddhananda) are prime examples.

Terrified

Godse pointed out that Gandhi Ji was scarred by bullies. He often schools the victims while not sparing a word against the perpetrators.

Gandhi Ji's admonition to Jews to let Hitler kill them because there is dignity in accepting death is both humorous and horrifying. It also gives the impression that Gandhi Ji is easily intimidated by bullies. Multiple versions exist in which Gandhi Ji is blamed for teaching his students the virtue of non-violence before slaughter. The interesting thing was that only Hindus were sermonised and pushed into accepting his wishes, while Muslims were spared and permitted to burn down the nation.

Incompetence

Godse believed Gandhi Ji lacked the ability to battle the British because he was too mild on adversaries. Gandhi Ji's actions in calling off the non-cooperation movement, not endorsing HMS or other organisations, pleading with the Muslim League on multiple occasions with no success, initially refusing to participate in war efforts and then supporting them are just a few of the many flip-flops that demonstrated a failure to understand the ground situation and make realistic decisions.

Coercion

Godse stated Gandhi Ji used coercive ways to control his followers. His "fast unto death" weapon proved effective in silencing his opponents and detractors. The eventual consequence was a high death toll and the partition of India owing to Gandhi's intransigence and the greed of the Muslim League and Congress. It all began with the Khilafat revolution in 1920-21 and finished with the partition of India. The book contains detailed explanations of these acts.

Image courtesy: Google Images